Is Leadership Actually Improving over Time?
A quite asked to me recently rather swept me off my feet. It was: “Is Leadership Actually Improving Over Time?’.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer, in fact – I couldn’t really give a proper answer at the point of questioning, because there were too many factors to think about. We will work through these below.
The first factor is about how we are actually going to measure the growth or improvement in leadership quality over the years. There are several issues with this measurement process:
The lack of a good quantitative means of measuring success. Share prices (Market Cap) of companies would be a terrible proxy for leadership because they are affected by so many other factors, such as economic cycles, politics, monetary and fiscal policy. Other factors such as the results of certain polls and surveys wouldn’t be comparable to surveys and polls taken many years ago, because polls are not consistent between decades as different researchers researching leadership styles and leadership courses have slightly different hypotheses.
When it comes to qualitative factors, we’re in no better position. The personal account of famous leaders throughout history will be littered with error and bias, and will make for an unfair comparison across the ages. Giving a thorough qualitative survey to leaders now asking about the leadership skills of leaders during their lifetime would also through bias onto the fire.
So rather than approaching this in a scientific way, we could look at the changes in the leadership landscape over the years, as highlighted by the leadership authors and commentators. History may not paint a perfectly accurate picture of the real changes on the ground of real British business, but it would provide the best picture we can attain.
In my opinion, due to the increases in leadership education as well as a larger aspirational middle class than 50 years ago, leadership has improved significantly, becoming more democratic and more transparent.